HOUSTON – Sooner or later on Sunday, the numbers will begin rolling in to point out what number of People watched the men’s Final Four.
They most likely will not be nice. Newsflash: A Final Four with Florida Atlantic, San Diego State, Miami and UConn, 4 coaches who usually are not family names and never projected first-round NBA draft picks, is unlikely to seize the creativeness of the informal basketball fan.
Miami coach Jim Larrañaga mentioned, “If you’re expecting all four No. 1 seeds to be in the Final Four every year, it doesn’t work out that way.” “There’s a lot of parity in college basketball.”
Stated one other means: save your grudges. That is what faculty basketball is all about. Embrace it or go search for one thing else.
If this Final Four is not your cup of tea, then the one individuals you are going to miss are the CBS executives. And but, a wierd, one-time Final Four with out Blueblood is not going to be the downfall of community tv or the worth of the NCAA men’s event.
Whether or not TV rankings are higher than anticipated or the bottom within the fashionable period, there’s little cause for school basketball followers to care.
Florida Atlantic coach Dusty Could mentioned, “I love watching it because it’s an opportunity for guys out of the national spotlight to get on the big stage and show what they can do.” “I think it’s great to have new faces to the sport, new people on the scene. I think it’s really cool.
The peculiarity of college basketball is that one year, you get a Final Four with Kansas, North Carolina, Duke and Villanova – a group of teams that own a combined 18 NCAA tournament titles – and the next you get three programs that make the semifinals. Make semi-finals for. first time.
As much as the ups and downs and Cinderella stories of the opening round make the tournament popular, it’s no secret that the ideal Final Four for television ratings would include at least two or three bluebloods each year. Kentucky and UCLA garner more attention than FAU and San Diego State, and that’s never going to change.
but guess what? CBS executives do not have the right to choose.
It’s a game, and the magic of true competition is that we don’t have the answers ahead of time.
Only John Calipari could have made Kentucky a better team than Miami, but he didn’t.
Nothing could stop UCLA from losing two of its key players to injury at the end of the season, so they were out.
Who knows what might have happened to Kansas if Bill Self had not required a heart procedure the week before the NCAA tournament, but life intervened and he could not coach.
North Carolina was supposed to get back in position to win the national title based on what they brought back from the previous year’s runner-up team, but they never quite put together.
So this is what we have.
“It is undoubtedly an unorthodox group of groups,” Larrañaga said.
And he earned every bit of it.
So, exactly, why does this mean doom and gloom for college basketball?
Look, there are some real problems at play. Some of them can be addressed through rule changes.
But at the end of the day, college basketball is not in the same state of the sporting and cultural landscape as it was in the 1980s or 1990s. The regular season is mostly for the hard-core, and December, January, and February aren’t as attention-grabbing as they used to be.
It’s a difficult thing to fix.
But there’s no way to change that without screwing up the nature of the NCAA tournament. You get 68 teams across a wide spectrum of conferences, and with all the variables that now go into roster-building from the likeness of name, image and transfer portal, the margins between them are relatively small.
It was clear that there really weren’t any dominant teams this entire season and a lot of blueblood programs were going through various stages of transition.
Guess what? All the parity made the first round of the tournament the most watched ever. That was great for CBS and Turner, but does it really affect your life in any way?
The same would be true if ratings dropped significantly for this Final Four. Unless you’re an employee of CBS or a corporation that bought advertising space during the Games, this kind of year-to-year fluctuation isn’t your problem.
Heck, even the NCAA doesn’t have much to do here. He has locked himself into a 16-year television deal that doesn’t come up for renewal until 2032. Even now, the decision to expand so far into the future is considered one of the biggest blunders of former NCAA president Mark Emmert’s tenure, as it undervalued one of the most important television properties in all of sports.
For all the moaning and complaining about ratings, you better believe that the networks will be willing to pay more than it’s worth now that the NCAA has its first opportunity to negotiate a new contract.
So, sure, TV rankings are prone to endure with this group of non-traditional groups within the Final Four. If that is the value followers paid for the drama and unpredictability of the previous two weeks, you will pay it each time.